.png)
Why Doesn't She Just Leave?
"Just leave" is dangerous advice. Here are some of the real reasons survivors of intimate partner violence stay, and the question we should be asking instead.
.png)
Hedrick v Toews: Workplace Stalking, Frustration of Contract, and Employer Duties
A BC court rejected an employer's frustration defence where its inaction on workplace stalking contributed to the employee's injuries. What employers must learn.
.png)
Why Most Workplace Sexual Harassment Goes Unnoticed (And What Employers Can Do About It)
Most workplace sexual harassment isn't the obvious kind. Here's what employers miss, why standard harassment training falls short, and what works instead.
.png)
Two Upcoming Human Rights Cases Could Change How Employers Approach Domestic Violence at Work
Two human rights cases may help clarify whether domestic violence survivorship is protected under Canadian human rights law. Here's what employers should be watching and why it matters for workplace policies, accommodation, and legal compliance.
.png)
The Employer Duty Nobody Explains: Domestic Violence and OHSA Section 32.0.4
Ontario employers must act on domestic violence risk at work, often earlier than they think. A legal analysis of OHSA s. 32.0.4, with FOI findings.
.png)
Canada's New Tort of Intimate Partner Violence: A Feminist Analysis of Ahluwalia and the Barriers That Remain
The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized a new tort of intimate partner violence in Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia. This post analyzes the legal test, its feminist significance, and the structural barriers that survivors will still face in bringing a claim.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)